<code id='B1092F7E97'></code><style id='B1092F7E97'></style>
    • <acronym id='B1092F7E97'></acronym>
      <center id='B1092F7E97'><center id='B1092F7E97'><tfoot id='B1092F7E97'></tfoot></center><abbr id='B1092F7E97'><dir id='B1092F7E97'><tfoot id='B1092F7E97'></tfoot><noframes id='B1092F7E97'>

    • <optgroup id='B1092F7E97'><strike id='B1092F7E97'><sup id='B1092F7E97'></sup></strike><code id='B1092F7E97'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='B1092F7E97'><label id='B1092F7E97'><select id='B1092F7E97'><dt id='B1092F7E97'><span id='B1092F7E97'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='B1092F7E97'></u>
          <i id='B1092F7E97'><strike id='B1092F7E97'><tt id='B1092F7E97'><pre id='B1092F7E97'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          comprehensive

          comprehensive

          author:Wikipedia    Page View:6
          Photo of a doctor holding a cellphone. -- first opinion coverage from STAT
          Adobe

          Thinking about messaging your physician about a weird rash? You may want to hold off on it. Some hospital systems have started charging patients for digital messages to their doctors via the electronic medical record, either a flat rate (like a copay) or on sliding scale depending on the time or complexity of the physician’s response. Sometimes it’s billed through an insurer, sometimes as a direct cost to the patient. Costs have ranged between less than $10 and $100 for a message.

          Now that at least 22 hospital systems have implemented the practice, a great debate has broken out in the medical profession: Is charging patients to send a note to a doctor just common sense or an unjust expense?

          advertisement

          In asking family, friends, and colleagues about this, my grandmother’s response was the most enlightening: “I’m surprised doctors ever stopped charging for phone calls!”

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In

          explore

          Supreme Court strikes down use of affirmative action
          Supreme Court strikes down use of affirmative action

          ActivistsdemonstratedastheSupremeCourtheardoralargumentsonapairofaffirmativeactioncasesinOctober2022

          read more
          Ohioans vote in high
          Ohioans vote in high

          7:40AsignaskingOhioanstovoteinsupportofIssue1sitsaboveanothersignadvocatingagainstabortionrightsatan

          read more
          Alkermes shareholders re
          Alkermes shareholders re

          MarkLennihan/APAlkermesshareholdersvotedThursdaytore-electallofthedrugmaker’scurrentdirectors,ending

          read more

          Choosing scientific sides in the fight against Alzheimer's

          MollyFergusonforSTATIn1906,Dr.AloisAlzheimerworkedwithapatientnamedAugustD.,awomanwithextremememoryl