focus -WSS

focus

author：comprehensive 2025-09-29 09:08:12 Page View：12523

Two researchers look at a computer monitor showing a graph and other data — Adobe

Research universities are voicing concerns over some proposed changes to the process for reviewing scientific misconduct allegations, citing worries that new government requirements would hobble their own independent procedures and constitute a huge administrative burden.

Nearly two decades since it last released research misconduct rules, the U.S. Office of Research Integrity (ORI) is ready to update its requirements for ensuring the scientific standards of projects funded by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, including the National Institutes of Health.

The proposed changes, published on Oct. 6, include a new formal process that institutions would follow in reviewing allegations, a 30-day deadline for institutions to assess allegations, and provisions that make it harder to quickly dismiss cases that institutions believe to be “honest errors.”

Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

Subscribe Log In

Previous article： FDA weighs limits of animal data in assessing artificial wombs
Next article： BioMarin wins approval for gene therapy to treat hemophilia A

focus

Cancer drug shortages should be causing more outrage

DrugshortagesareagrowingproblemintheU.S.,andashortageoflivesavingcancerdrugsinparticularhasreachedcr

The struggle to figure out which patients 'deserve' Wegovy

AdobeThereisjustnotenoughWegovy.Thecurrentmanufacturingshortagewilleventuallyend,andthosewhohaveheal

As demand for Covid shots wanes, Moderna seeks its next success

RubyWallauforSTATModernachairmanNoubarAfeyanexudedstarpowerearlierthismonthashecommandedthespotlight

As a primary care physician, here's how I hope to partner with AI

AdobeIambothexcitedandterrifiedbytheentranceofartificialintelligenceintomyprimarycarepractice.AI’sen

focus

explore

focus

As a primary care physician, here's how I hope to partner with AI