<code id='617087CFDF'></code><style id='617087CFDF'></style>
    • <acronym id='617087CFDF'></acronym>
      <center id='617087CFDF'><center id='617087CFDF'><tfoot id='617087CFDF'></tfoot></center><abbr id='617087CFDF'><dir id='617087CFDF'><tfoot id='617087CFDF'></tfoot><noframes id='617087CFDF'>

    • <optgroup id='617087CFDF'><strike id='617087CFDF'><sup id='617087CFDF'></sup></strike><code id='617087CFDF'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='617087CFDF'><label id='617087CFDF'><select id='617087CFDF'><dt id='617087CFDF'><span id='617087CFDF'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='617087CFDF'></u>
          <i id='617087CFDF'><strike id='617087CFDF'><tt id='617087CFDF'><pre id='617087CFDF'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          knowledge

          knowledge

          author:fashion    Page View:9
          AP/Business Wire

          There are a lot of reasons why updated data on Pfizer’s Lorbrena, a treatment for non-small cell lung cancer, might not seem to be a big deal. The results are an update on the clinical trial that resulted in the Food and Drug Administration granting Lorbrena full approval in 2001, so in a sense they are not even that new. For Pfizer investors, Lorbrena isn’t that big a deal, either. The medicine, for patients whose lung tumors have particular genetic mutations, generated only $575 million last year — an amount that is up 57% from the year prior, but that still constitutes only 1% of the drug giant’s annual sales.

          But there is one number that makes the Lorbrena data quite eye-catching: In the updated data, the daily pill decreased the risk that cancer would progress or that a patient would die by 81% over five years.

          advertisement

          That’s a stunning number, especially when one considers that Lorbrena was not being compared to an inert placebo but to Xalkori, another Pfizer targeted cancer drug.

          STAT+ Exclusive Story

          Already have an account? Log in

          STAT+

          This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers

          Unlock this article — plus daily coverage and analysis of the biotech sector — by subscribing to STAT+.

          Already have an account? Log in

          Already have an account? Log in

          Monthly

          $39

          Totals $468 per year

          $39/month Get Started

          Totals $468 per year

          Starter

          $30

          for 3 months, then $39/month

          $30 for 3 months Get Started

          Then $39/month

          Annual

          $399

          Save 15%

          $399/year Get Started

          Save 15%

          11+ Users

          Custom

          Savings start at 25%!

          Request A Quote Request A Quote

          Savings start at 25%!

          2-10 Users

          $300

          Annually per user

          $300/year Get Started

          $300 Annually per user

          View All Plans

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In

          explore

          Heart attack and stroke risk calculators need revising
          Heart attack and stroke risk calculators need revising

          AdobeForbusyprimarycarephysicianslikeme,anannualphysicalwitha27-year-oldmaleisablessing.Sincewe’real

          read more
          Astellas still sees hope in its gene therapy after four deaths
          Astellas still sees hope in its gene therapy after four deaths

          AdobeAgenetherapystudy,haltedwhenfourchildrenwitharareneuromusculardisorderdiedaftertreatment,showed

          read more
          In age of alternative facts, a scholarly course on calling out crap
          In age of alternative facts, a scholarly course on calling out crap

          Screenshotviacallingbullshit.orgTiredofalternativefacts,fakenews,andbreathlesshyperbole,twoprofessor

          read more

          Does good food count as health care? Study aims to find out

          DianeWoodfordunpacksadeliveryfromCommunityServingsinherkitcheninBoston.Eachdeliverycontainsfivedays'