<code id='8BC378FBDE'></code><style id='8BC378FBDE'></style>
    • <acronym id='8BC378FBDE'></acronym>
      <center id='8BC378FBDE'><center id='8BC378FBDE'><tfoot id='8BC378FBDE'></tfoot></center><abbr id='8BC378FBDE'><dir id='8BC378FBDE'><tfoot id='8BC378FBDE'></tfoot><noframes id='8BC378FBDE'>

    • <optgroup id='8BC378FBDE'><strike id='8BC378FBDE'><sup id='8BC378FBDE'></sup></strike><code id='8BC378FBDE'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='8BC378FBDE'><label id='8BC378FBDE'><select id='8BC378FBDE'><dt id='8BC378FBDE'><span id='8BC378FBDE'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='8BC378FBDE'></u>
          <i id='8BC378FBDE'><strike id='8BC378FBDE'><tt id='8BC378FBDE'><pre id='8BC378FBDE'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          focus

          focus

          author:explore    Page View:51946
          AP/Business Wire

          There are a lot of reasons why updated data on Pfizer’s Lorbrena, a treatment for non-small cell lung cancer, might not seem to be a big deal. The results are an update on the clinical trial that resulted in the Food and Drug Administration granting Lorbrena full approval in 2001, so in a sense they are not even that new. For Pfizer investors, Lorbrena isn’t that big a deal, either. The medicine, for patients whose lung tumors have particular genetic mutations, generated only $575 million last year — an amount that is up 57% from the year prior, but that still constitutes only 1% of the drug giant’s annual sales.

          But there is one number that makes the Lorbrena data quite eye-catching: In the updated data, the daily pill decreased the risk that cancer would progress or that a patient would die by 81% over five years.

          advertisement

          That’s a stunning number, especially when one considers that Lorbrena was not being compared to an inert placebo but to Xalkori, another Pfizer targeted cancer drug.

          STAT+ Exclusive Story

          Already have an account? Log in

          STAT+

          This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers

          Unlock this article — plus daily coverage and analysis of the biotech sector — by subscribing to STAT+.

          Already have an account? Log in

          Already have an account? Log in

          Monthly

          $39

          Totals $468 per year

          $39/month Get Started

          Totals $468 per year

          Starter

          $30

          for 3 months, then $39/month

          $30 for 3 months Get Started

          Then $39/month

          Annual

          $399

          Save 15%

          $399/year Get Started

          Save 15%

          11+ Users

          Custom

          Savings start at 25%!

          Request A Quote Request A Quote

          Savings start at 25%!

          2-10 Users

          $300

          Annually per user

          $300/year Get Started

          $300 Annually per user

          View All Plans

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In

          Wikipedia

          State Dept. review finds Biden bears some blame for Afghanistan failures
          State Dept. review finds Biden bears some blame for Afghanistan failures

          3:53HundredsofpeoplegathernearaU.S.AirForceC-17transportplaneattheperimeteroftheinternationalairport

          read more
          FDA panel signals lack of confidence in Amgen cancer drug data
          FDA panel signals lack of confidence in Amgen cancer drug data

          AdobeTheclearanceofafirst-of-its-kindcancertreatmentmadebyAmgenisonshakiergroundfollowingaFoodandDru

          read more
          Psychedelics group wrestles with new pharma identity
          Psychedelics group wrestles with new pharma identity

          OliviaGoldhill/STATDENVER—Hecouldhavebeenarockstar,areligiousicon,thewayecstaticapplausefromthousand

          read more

          Readout Newsletter: GSK, Viking Therapeutics, mifepristone news

          SangTan/APWanttostayontopofthescienceandpoliticsdrivingbiotechtoday? Signup togetourbiotechnewslette