<code id='F6DC0DDBBC'></code><style id='F6DC0DDBBC'></style>
    • <acronym id='F6DC0DDBBC'></acronym>
      <center id='F6DC0DDBBC'><center id='F6DC0DDBBC'><tfoot id='F6DC0DDBBC'></tfoot></center><abbr id='F6DC0DDBBC'><dir id='F6DC0DDBBC'><tfoot id='F6DC0DDBBC'></tfoot><noframes id='F6DC0DDBBC'>

    • <optgroup id='F6DC0DDBBC'><strike id='F6DC0DDBBC'><sup id='F6DC0DDBBC'></sup></strike><code id='F6DC0DDBBC'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='F6DC0DDBBC'><label id='F6DC0DDBBC'><select id='F6DC0DDBBC'><dt id='F6DC0DDBBC'><span id='F6DC0DDBBC'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='F6DC0DDBBC'></u>
          <i id='F6DC0DDBBC'><strike id='F6DC0DDBBC'><tt id='F6DC0DDBBC'><pre id='F6DC0DDBBC'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          knowledge

          knowledge

          author:entertainment    Page View:47
          Photo illustration based on photograph of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas in 2022
          Photo illustration: STAT; Photo: Adobe

          Prominent immunologist and oncologist Padmanee Sharma defended herself in court on Friday against a lawsuit that alleges she threatened to undermine a junior faculty member’s career, made defamatory comments about the younger scientist, and attempted to take credit for work that she didn’t do.

          In legal filings submitted to the Harris County District Court, Sharma said that she made substantial contributions to an immunotherapy project that were ignored, and that a third-party assessment commissioned by MD Anderson Cancer Center concluded Sharma should be given credit for her role. Sharma had previously issued a general denial of the allegations against her and claimed immunity from the suit as a government employee. As part of the University of Texas, MD Anderson is a state institution.

          advertisement

          The filing, which was submitted by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and lawyers in his office, also argued that the junior researcher’s lawsuit should be made against MD Anderson, not Sharma, and asked the court to dismiss the suit if it is not amended within 30 days. “Dr. Sharma is not a proper party to this lawsuit; only MDACC is,” the filing states. “This lawsuit is about proper accreditation in scientific literature for research performed at MDACC by MDACC faculty.”

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In

          comprehensive

          Trump demands the U.S. pay no more for drugs than other countries … again
          Trump demands the U.S. pay no more for drugs than other countries … again

          EthanMiller/GettyImagesWASHINGTON—FormerPresidentTrumpisbacktocampaigningfortyingMedicaredrugpricest

          read more
          New case study details death in closely watched Alzhiemer's trial
          New case study details death in closely watched Alzhiemer's trial

          AbrainaffectedbyAlzheimer'sdisease,attheMuseumofNeuroanatomyattheUniversityatBuffalo.DavidDuprey/API

          read more
          Wildfire smoke exposes gaps in outdoor worker protections
          Wildfire smoke exposes gaps in outdoor worker protections

          ApersonwaitingforthesubwaywearsafilteredmaskassmokyhazefromwildfiresinCanadablanketsaneighborhoodinN

          read more

          Inside the fall of star MIT scientist David Sabatini

          DavidSabatini,abiologistwhooncegeneratedNobelPrizebuzz.WikimediaCommonsThe7a.m.AcelaoutofSouthStatio