<code id='6A0A150169'></code><style id='6A0A150169'></style>
    • <acronym id='6A0A150169'></acronym>
      <center id='6A0A150169'><center id='6A0A150169'><tfoot id='6A0A150169'></tfoot></center><abbr id='6A0A150169'><dir id='6A0A150169'><tfoot id='6A0A150169'></tfoot><noframes id='6A0A150169'>

    • <optgroup id='6A0A150169'><strike id='6A0A150169'><sup id='6A0A150169'></sup></strike><code id='6A0A150169'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='6A0A150169'><label id='6A0A150169'><select id='6A0A150169'><dt id='6A0A150169'><span id='6A0A150169'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='6A0A150169'></u>
          <i id='6A0A150169'><strike id='6A0A150169'><tt id='6A0A150169'><pre id='6A0A150169'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          comprehensive

          comprehensive

          author:focus    Page View:2932
          Photo illustration based on photograph of The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, Texas in 2022
          Photo illustration: STAT; Photo: Adobe

          Prominent immunologist and oncologist Padmanee Sharma defended herself in court on Friday against a lawsuit that alleges she threatened to undermine a junior faculty member’s career, made defamatory comments about the younger scientist, and attempted to take credit for work that she didn’t do.

          In legal filings submitted to the Harris County District Court, Sharma said that she made substantial contributions to an immunotherapy project that were ignored, and that a third-party assessment commissioned by MD Anderson Cancer Center concluded Sharma should be given credit for her role. Sharma had previously issued a general denial of the allegations against her and claimed immunity from the suit as a government employee. As part of the University of Texas, MD Anderson is a state institution.

          advertisement

          The filing, which was submitted by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and lawyers in his office, also argued that the junior researcher’s lawsuit should be made against MD Anderson, not Sharma, and asked the court to dismiss the suit if it is not amended within 30 days. “Dr. Sharma is not a proper party to this lawsuit; only MDACC is,” the filing states. “This lawsuit is about proper accreditation in scientific literature for research performed at MDACC by MDACC faculty.”

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In

          explore

          Medical leaders decry Supreme Court decision on affirmative action
          Medical leaders decry Supreme Court decision on affirmative action

          STEFANIREYNOLDS/AFPviaGettyImagesMedicalleadersonThursdayreactedswiftlytotheSupremeCourt’sdecisionto

          read more
          How digital tools helped lower hypertension in marginalized patients
          How digital tools helped lower hypertension in marginalized patients

          Digitaltoolstobettertrackbloodpressureovertimeandencourageadherencetotreatmentplansareincreasinglyco

          read more
          Indiana Supreme Court upholds abortion ban, says state constitution gives only limited protections
          Indiana Supreme Court upholds abortion ban, says state constitution gives only limited protections

          FILE-Abortion-rightsprotestersfillIndianaStatehousecorridorsandcheeroutsidelegislativechambers,Frida

          read more

          Robert F. Kennedy is pitching centrism on health, even on abortion

          RobertF.KennedyJr.talkswithreportersinthelobbyofTrumpTowerin2017.EvanVucci/APYou’rereadingthewebedit