<code id='7757938407'></code><style id='7757938407'></style>
    • <acronym id='7757938407'></acronym>
      <center id='7757938407'><center id='7757938407'><tfoot id='7757938407'></tfoot></center><abbr id='7757938407'><dir id='7757938407'><tfoot id='7757938407'></tfoot><noframes id='7757938407'>

    • <optgroup id='7757938407'><strike id='7757938407'><sup id='7757938407'></sup></strike><code id='7757938407'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='7757938407'><label id='7757938407'><select id='7757938407'><dt id='7757938407'><span id='7757938407'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='7757938407'></u>
          <i id='7757938407'><strike id='7757938407'><tt id='7757938407'><pre id='7757938407'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          knowledge

          knowledge

          author:fashion    Page View:834
          DNA illo
          Adobe

          Today, if you want to know what scary family health secrets lay buried in your DNA or get screened for a lurking cancer, you have a lot of options. Laboratories have developed more than 75,000 genetic tests, with about 10 new ones entering the market daily. By the end of 2019, more than 26 million Americans had had their DNA decoded to some degree or another. Since then, that number has surely grown.

          But this testing frenzy would have been inconceivable just 10 years ago. In part, that’s because the technology back then was so expensive. More importantly, until 2013, it was common practice for gene-hunting academics and companies to lock up their discoveries with DNA patents, effectively carving up the human genome into mini-monopolies. That year, the U.S. Supreme Court threw a bomb into the biotech world when it took up a landmark case that pitted cancer survivors and the American Civil Liberties Union against a diagnostics company called Myriad Genetics, which had obtained exclusive patents on the cancer-causing BRCA genes and made billions of dollars selling tests for them.

          advertisement

          A new book called “The Genome Defense,” written by University of Utah science and technology law expert Jorge Contreras and being published Oct. 26, provides a front-row seat to the courtroom drama that would upend three decades of federal intellectual property law and chart a new course toward balancing corporate profits with the rights of all people to the information written into their DNA.

          STAT+ Exclusive Story

          Already have an account? Log in

          STAT+

          This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers

          Unlock this article — plus daily coverage and analysis of the biotech sector — by subscribing to STAT+.

          Already have an account? Log in

          Already have an account? Log in

          Monthly

          $39

          Totals $468 per year

          $39/month Get Started

          Totals $468 per year

          Starter

          $30

          for 3 months, then $39/month

          $30 for 3 months Get Started

          Then $39/month

          Annual

          $399

          Save 15%

          $399/year Get Started

          Save 15%

          11+ Users

          Custom

          Savings start at 25%!

          Request A Quote Request A Quote

          Savings start at 25%!

          2-10 Users

          $300

          Annually per user

          $300/year Get Started

          $300 Annually per user

          View All Plans

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In

          knowledge

          In age of alternative facts, a scholarly course on calling out crap
          In age of alternative facts, a scholarly course on calling out crap

          Screenshotviacallingbullshit.orgTiredofalternativefacts,fakenews,andbreathlesshyperbole,twoprofessor

          read more
          CVS is on a mission to consolidate health care. Will it work?
          CVS is on a mission to consolidate health care. Will it work?

          SuzanneKreiter/GlobestaffCVSHealthisperhapsbestknownfortwothings.First,therearethecomicallylongrecei

          read more
          Alkermes shareholders re
          Alkermes shareholders re

          MarkLennihan/APAlkermesshareholdersvotedThursdaytore-electallofthedrugmaker’scurrentdirectors,ending

          read more

          Life sciences deals on track to hit lowest point since 2017

          AdobeIt’snosecretthatbiotechindustryfundinghasfallenfromitsCovidhighs.Butwithjustafewmonthsleftinthe