<code id='2AA4953103'></code><style id='2AA4953103'></style>
    • <acronym id='2AA4953103'></acronym>
      <center id='2AA4953103'><center id='2AA4953103'><tfoot id='2AA4953103'></tfoot></center><abbr id='2AA4953103'><dir id='2AA4953103'><tfoot id='2AA4953103'></tfoot><noframes id='2AA4953103'>

    • <optgroup id='2AA4953103'><strike id='2AA4953103'><sup id='2AA4953103'></sup></strike><code id='2AA4953103'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='2AA4953103'><label id='2AA4953103'><select id='2AA4953103'><dt id='2AA4953103'><span id='2AA4953103'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='2AA4953103'></u>
          <i id='2AA4953103'><strike id='2AA4953103'><tt id='2AA4953103'><pre id='2AA4953103'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          knowledge

          knowledge

          author:hotspot    Page View:994
          AP/Business Wire

          There are a lot of reasons why updated data on Pfizer’s Lorbrena, a treatment for non-small cell lung cancer, might not seem to be a big deal. The results are an update on the clinical trial that resulted in the Food and Drug Administration granting Lorbrena full approval in 2001, so in a sense they are not even that new. For Pfizer investors, Lorbrena isn’t that big a deal, either. The medicine, for patients whose lung tumors have particular genetic mutations, generated only $575 million last year — an amount that is up 57% from the year prior, but that still constitutes only 1% of the drug giant’s annual sales.

          But there is one number that makes the Lorbrena data quite eye-catching: In the updated data, the daily pill decreased the risk that cancer would progress or that a patient would die by 81% over five years.

          advertisement

          That’s a stunning number, especially when one considers that Lorbrena was not being compared to an inert placebo but to Xalkori, another Pfizer targeted cancer drug.

          STAT+ Exclusive Story

          Already have an account? Log in

          STAT+

          This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers

          Unlock this article — plus daily coverage and analysis of the biotech sector — by subscribing to STAT+.

          Already have an account? Log in

          Already have an account? Log in

          Monthly

          $39

          Totals $468 per year

          $39/month Get Started

          Totals $468 per year

          Starter

          $30

          for 3 months, then $39/month

          $30 for 3 months Get Started

          Then $39/month

          Annual

          $399

          Save 15%

          $399/year Get Started

          Save 15%

          11+ Users

          Custom

          Savings start at 25%!

          Request A Quote Request A Quote

          Savings start at 25%!

          2-10 Users

          $300

          Annually per user

          $300/year Get Started

          $300 Annually per user

          View All Plans

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In

          focus

          At least 13 dead in Texas as scorching temps continue
          At least 13 dead in Texas as scorching temps continue

          1:17FirefighterEMTWilliamDorseyandfirefighterEMTRodrigoPinedatreatamigrantwomansufferingfromheatexha

          read more
          GOP hopefuls to address prominent, controversial group questioning what's taught in schools
          GOP hopefuls to address prominent, controversial group questioning what's taught in schools

          1:29AmemberofMomsforLibertyprotestsagainstmandatoryfacemasksforstudentsduringtheCOVID-19pandemicatam

          read more
          In Memoriam: Notable people who died in 2023
          In Memoriam: Notable people who died in 2023

          1:29AlanArkinattendsthe26thAnnualScreenActorsGuildAwardsatTheShrineAuditoriumonJan.19,2020inLosAngel

          read more

          Cheap, fast test for Zika and dengue could cost just $1

          NikolasAlbarranandJoseGomez-MarquezAnewblood testcancheaplyandquicklydistinguishbetweenthemosquito-b