<code id='926F189DEC'></code><style id='926F189DEC'></style>
    • <acronym id='926F189DEC'></acronym>
      <center id='926F189DEC'><center id='926F189DEC'><tfoot id='926F189DEC'></tfoot></center><abbr id='926F189DEC'><dir id='926F189DEC'><tfoot id='926F189DEC'></tfoot><noframes id='926F189DEC'>

    • <optgroup id='926F189DEC'><strike id='926F189DEC'><sup id='926F189DEC'></sup></strike><code id='926F189DEC'></code></optgroup>
        1. <b id='926F189DEC'><label id='926F189DEC'><select id='926F189DEC'><dt id='926F189DEC'><span id='926F189DEC'></span></dt></select></label></b><u id='926F189DEC'></u>
          <i id='926F189DEC'><strike id='926F189DEC'><tt id='926F189DEC'><pre id='926F189DEC'></pre></tt></strike></i>

          knowledge

          knowledge

          author:leisure time    Page View:9
          Eli Lilly headquarters in Indianapolis – pharmaceutical coverage from STAT
          Darron Cummings/AP

          Advisers to the Food and Drug Administration voted 11-0 on Monday to recommend the approval of a drug for early Alzheimer’s disease made by Eli Lilly — ruling that the treatment’s ability to slow the cognitive decline in patients outweighed its safety risks.

          The unanimous outcome of the daylong advisory panel was the best-case scenario for Lilly, making it likely that the FDA will approve the drug, called donanemab, for a broad population of people diagnosed with mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s. A decision is expected later this year.

          advertisement

          “The benefits outweigh the risks, as long as the risks are being monitored,” said Kathleen Poston, a neurologist at Stanford University and a member of the advisory panel.

          STAT+ Exclusive Story

          Already have an account? Log in

          STAT+

          This article is exclusive to STAT+ subscribers

          Unlock this article — plus daily coverage and analysis of the biotech sector — by subscribing to STAT+.

          Already have an account? Log in

          Already have an account? Log in

          Monthly

          $39

          Totals $468 per year

          $39/month Get Started

          Totals $468 per year

          Starter

          $30

          for 3 months, then $39/month

          $30 for 3 months Get Started

          Then $39/month

          Annual

          $399

          Save 15%

          $399/year Get Started

          Save 15%

          11+ Users

          Custom

          Savings start at 25%!

          Request A Quote Request A Quote

          Savings start at 25%!

          2-10 Users

          $300

          Annually per user

          $300/year Get Started

          $300 Annually per user

          View All Plans

          Get unlimited access to award-winning journalism and exclusive events.

          Subscribe Log In

          explore

          23andMe had bad news about my health. I wish a person had delivered it
          23andMe had bad news about my health. I wish a person had delivered it

          ERICBARADAT/AFP/GettyImagesLastsummer,IthoughtitmightbefuntohavemyDNAanalyzed.Twocompanies,23andMean

          read more
          ASCO24: AstraZeneca won cancer’s big meeting. Can it fulfill its $80B ambition?
          ASCO24: AstraZeneca won cancer’s big meeting. Can it fulfill its $80B ambition?

          SusanGalbraith,AstraZeneca’sheadofcancerresearchanddevelopment,speaksataSTATeventin2023.MarieMillerf

          read more
          Biden outlines 'new path' to provide student loan relief after Supreme Court rejection
          Biden outlines 'new path' to provide student loan relief after Supreme Court rejection

          6:16PresidentJoeBidenspeaksintheRooseveltRoomoftheWhiteHouse,June30,2023.EvanVucci/APPresidentJoeBid

          read more

          Pregnant women don't need prenatal multivitamins, study concludes

          APStockPrenatalvitaminsareastapleofmodernpregnancy. ButareportoutMondayin thejournalDrugandTherapeut